مفهوم الحدس في النظرية التوليدية التحويلية
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
منشور:
Dec 25, 2012
الكلمات المفتاحية:
المعطيات اللغوية الحدس التوليدية السياق المعنى
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
الملخص
يتناول هذا البحث مفهوم الحدس ودوره داخل النظرية التوليدية التحويلية؛ بوصفه أحد أهم المصادر التي تعتمد عليها هذه النظرية في استقاء المعطيات اللغوية التي تعكس جانباً من جوانب معرفة المتكلم اللغوية التي يتعامل معها النحاة التوليديون بهدف صياغة فرضياتهم التي تحاول الكشف عن نوع من العمومية المطلقة التي تشترك فيها اللغات الإنسانية على اختلاف ألسنتها، ويبين البحث أن مثل هذه المنهجية في التعامل مع اللغة ومعطياتها منهجية معقدة بل مرفوضة من قبل العديد من علماء اللغة الذين يشددون على وظيفتها داخل المجتمع وعلى عوامل أخرى تفقد مفهوم الحدس صلاحيته في بناء الفرضيات التي تعتمدها هذه النظرية؛ ويبين كذلك أن جوهر هذا الخلاف إنما يتعلق بالفصل بين الملكة والأداء، وبين اللغة المثالية واللغة الواقعية المستخدمة في التواصل.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
كيفية الاقتباس
منتصرأ. ع. ا. (2012). مفهوم الحدس في النظرية التوليدية التحويلية. AL-Lisaniyyat, 18(2), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v18i2.462
القسم
Articles
المراجع
arbe réf p.29
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.