Le concept d'intuition dans la théorie générative transformatrice
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publié-e :
déc 25, 2012
Mots-clés :
Données linguistiques, intuition générative, contexte, sens
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Résumé
Cette étude se base sur le concept d'intuition et son rôle dans la théorie
générative transformationnelle qui définit ce concept comme source des
données linguistiques qui reflètent les connaissances des locuteurs. Le
problème d'intuition est devenu le centre d’intérêt des linguistes qui
analysent le langage comme un outil social de communication, car ils ont
tous considéré le langage comme un mode d'action et d'interaction. Cette
méthode a donc été rejetée et elle est devenue compliquée quand aucune
distinction claire n’a été faite entre la Compétence et la Performance et entre
la langue supposée idéale et la langue réellement utilisée dans la
communication.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Comment citer
Mountassir, A. A. errahim. (2012). Le concept d’intuition dans la théorie générative transformatrice. AL-Lisaniyyat, 18(2), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v18i2.462
Rubrique
Articles
Références
arbe réf p.29
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.