The concept of intuition in transformative generative theory
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 25, 2012
Keywords:
Linguistic data, generative intuition, context, meaning
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper focuses on the concept of intuition and its role in the
generative transformational theory which defines this concept as a source of
the linguistic data which reflect the speaker’s knowledge of his language.
The problem of intuition became the focus of the linguists interested in
language as a social tool of communication because they have considered
language as a mode of action and interaction; so this methodology was
rejected and it became complicated when no clear distinction was made
between Competence and Performance and between the supposed ideal
language and the language used in communication.
Article Details
How to Cite
Mountassir, A. A. errahim. (2012). The concept of intuition in transformative generative theory. AL-Lisaniyyat, 18(2), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v18i2.462
Section
Articles
References
arbe réf p.29
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.
Aitchison, J., 1997. The Language Web. Cambridge University Press.
Beaugrande, R., 2002. Descriptive Lingistics at the Millennium: Corpus
Data as Authentic Language. JLL, 1(2) : 91-131.
Bernestein, B., 1972. Social Class, Language, and Socialization. pp.157-178.
In Giglioli (Ed.) : Language and Social Context. Penguin.
Bolinger, D., 1968. Judgments of Grammaticality. Lingua 21:34-40.
Botha, R. P., 1981. The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Campbell, R. L., 1998. Why Chomskyan Linguistics is Antipsycological. In
M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 208-213). NJ:
Erlbaum.
Carter, M. G., 2004. Sibawayhi. The Maker of Arabic Civilization. Oxford
Center for Islamic Studies.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
— 2006: Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to
Sentence Judgements. London: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Ed.
Blackwell.
Evans, V. & M. Green, 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
Edinburgh University Press.
Goodwin, Ch. & A. Duranti, 1992. Rethinking Context. Reprinted from
Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Edited by
A. Duranti. & Ch. Goodwin. Cambridge University Press. 1-42.
Greenbaum, S. 1973. Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.
Lingua (31). 201-212.
— (Ed.). 1977. Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Greene, J, 1972. Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology
Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hudson, R. A., 1996: Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
— 1996. When Intuitions Fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin and M.
Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in
Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society 32: 77-106.
Lees, R. B., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Language 33 (3-1). 375-408.
Levelt, W. & al., 1977. Grammaticality, Paraphrase, and Imagery. 87-102. In
S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language. Mouton Publishers. The
Hague.
Marantz, A., 2005. Generative Linguistics within the Cognitive Neuroscience
of Language. Linguistic Review (22). 429 - 445,
Miyamoto, Y., 2003. On there-sentences. JLL 2 (2): 246-264.
Phillips, C., 2003. Linguistics and Linking Problems. To appear in: Rice, M.
& Warren, S.(Eds.). Developmental Language Disorders. NJ: Mahwah.
Sato, E., 2003: Minimality and Scope Rigidity in English. JLL, 2 (2): 283-322
Schutze, C. T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality
Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Snow, C. & G. Meijer, 1977. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic
Intuitions. 163-178. In: S. Greenbaum, (Ed.). Acceptability in Language.
The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Taylor, D. S., 1988. The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 9 (2). 148-168.
Turner, J., 1980. The Development of Competence. Educational Review
(2). 37-46.
Van Dijk, T., 1977. Acceptability in Context. 39-61 In S. Greenbaum, (Ed.).
Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Wasow, T. & J. Arnold, 2005. Intuitions in Linguistics Argumentation.
Lingua, (115). 1481-96.