Gender And Language Variation In The Community Of Chlef : The Relevance Of The Community Of Practice Perspective.

Main Article Content

Amina Babou

Abstract

A plethora of gender research have considered the community of practice (cofp)
framework as an analytical tool which serves for a penetrating analysis of variation. In this
paper, we strive to move towards a dynamic not static analysis and explore the avenue of
how gender is constructed through language. The gist of this paper is to scrutinise the
construction of meaning by means of linguistic variation which is part of the individual’s
participation in the different networks. We direct a limelight on the community of Chelifian
Arabic and Berber speakers. Variation can be considered, de facto, as part of the speaker’s
active participation and his/her construction of the social world and himself or herself in
that world.

Article Details

How to Cite
Babou , A. (2020). Gender And Language Variation In The Community Of Chlef : The Relevance Of The Community Of Practice Perspective. AL-Lisaniyyat, 26(2), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v26i2.251
Section
Articles

References

- Abdelhay, B. 2008. Males’ and Females’ Voice Quality in Mostaganem Spoken Arabic: A
Community of Practice Perspective. Unpublished ph.D Thesis, University of Oran.
- Badawi, E. 1973. Mustawayat al-arabiyya l-muasira fi misr. (Levels of contemporary
Arabic in Egypt). Cairo: Dar al-Maarif.
- Bouhadiba, Farouk A. N. 1988. Aspects of Algerian Arabic Verb Phonology and
Morphology, Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Reading. UK.
- Bucholtz, M. 1999. Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of
nerd girls. Language in Society pp. 203-223.
- Delattre, P. 1971. Systeme, Structure, Fonction, Evolution. Paris, Editeurs Malo Dorin.
- Durand, J. 1993. Sociolinguistic Variation and The Linguist. In: C. Sanders (ed.) French
Today: Language and its Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 257- 285.
- Eckert, P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School.
New York: Teachers College Press.
-Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Look
Locally:Language and Gender as Community-based practice”,in Annual Review of
Anthropology,21:416-90.
Eckert, P. 1996. Sex and Gender Differences in Variation. Language Variation and Change
1, 245-267.
- Gumperz, J. J. 1968. The Speech Community in International Encyclopedia of Social
Sciences. New York Macnillan, PP. 381-6.
- Harrell, R. S. 1957. The phonology of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. New York. Harvard
University.
- Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity. Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
- Labov, W. 1972. "Hypercorrection by the Lower Middle Class as a Factor in Linguistic
Change": Sociolinguistic Patterns. William Labov (ed.)
-Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
-Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
- Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
-Lehn, W. 1963. Emphasis in Cairo Arabic. Language 39.1:29-39.
-Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1985. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescriptions
and Standardisation. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
-Trudgill, P. 1972. Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of
Norwich. Language in Society. PP. 179 ,195.
-Wardhaugh, R. 2009. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
-Weatherall, A. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. London: Routledge.
- Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.