L'intertextualité dans les classes d'EFL

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ZOHRA MERABTI

Résumé

Le présent article vise à clarifier le concept d’intertextualité en tant que théorie littéraire et en tant que
une approche dans les contextes EFL. Il éclaire le sens de ce phénomène qui
crée un réseau de textes et de discours. De plus, le document tend à expliquer
l'intertextualité comme l'un des principaux standards de textualité de De Beaugrandee et Dressler selon lesquels
n’importe quel texte peut fonctionner comme un morceau de discours communicatif. Ensuite, il tente de discuter
la nature de cette démarche et son origine afin d'appréhender l'évolution de cette
théorie . Il détermine également les principales stratégies par lesquelles l'intertextualité peut être représentée.
dans n'importe quel discours. De plus, puisque l'intertextualité repose sur la relation des textes, il est très
important pour les apprenants d'EFL en termes de perception du discours des autres et de production de leur
propres textes. À cet égard, l'article tente de découvrir une relation entre l'intertextualité
approche et le développement de la perception et de la production des apprenants EFL.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Comment citer
MERABTI , Z. (2020). L’intertextualité dans les classes d’EFL. AL-Lisaniyyat, 26(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v26i2.253
Rubrique
Articles

Références

- Ahangari , S., & Sepehran, H. (2013). The effect of intertextuality on Iranian EFL learners’
critical writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Reaserch, 2 (1), 85-98.
- Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London and New York: Routledge.
- Armstrong, S.L., & Newman, M. (2011). Teaching textual conversations: Intertextuality in
the college reading classroom. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41 (2), 6-21.
- Baily, S. (2003). Academic writing: A practical guide for students. London and New York:
RoutledegeFalmer.
- Baily, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (3rd Ed.). London
and New York: Routledege.
- Baker, P., & Elleg, S. (2011). Key terms in discourse analysis. London and New York:
Continuum.
- Bazerman, Ch. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In Bazerman, Ch., &
Prior, P.A. (Eds.), What Writing Does and How it Does it: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts
and Textual Practice pp 1-11. Eurlbum. Retrieved on August, 19, 2017 from
http://education.ucsb.edu/bazerman/chapters/04c.intertextualitymeth.doc. PDF
- Behak, F. P., & Massari. (2009). Intertextuality : A superhighway to critical thinking in the
reading and writing classroom. pp 1-12. Retrieved on March, 03, 2017 from
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1560. PDF
- Blackmore, D. (2001). Discourse and relevance theory. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E.
Hamilton (Eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. pp 100-118. UK: Blackwell.
- Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Crème, P., & Lea, M. R. (2008). Writing at university: A guide for students (3rd Ed.). UK and
USA: Open University Press.
- De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. UK: Longman.
- Fairclough, K, A. (2003). Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London
and New York: Routeledge.
-Fawcet, S. (2011). Evergreen: A guide to writing with reading(9th Ed.). USA: Wadsworth.
- Finely, K. A. (2015). Intertextual connections in text sets: Creating Common Core
Curriculum for Middle School Reader. Master Dessertaion. School of Education Student
Capstone and Dissertation. Retrieved on January, 15,01,2018 from
https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu.pdf
- Gee, J, P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method (2nd Ed.).
London and New York: Routledge.
- Hodges, A. (2015). Intertextuality in discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton., & D.
-Schiffrin (Eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd Ed). pp 42-60. UK: Willey Blackwell.
- Karapetyan, S. (2006). Writing skills. Yerevan: Yervan Lingua.
- Kirszner, L. G., & Mandell, S. R. (2012). Patterns for College writing: A rhetorical reader
and guide(12th Ed.). Boston & New York: Bedford/ST. Martin's.
- Lenski , S, D. (1998). Intertextual intentions : Making connections across texts. Clearing
House, 72(2), 74-80
- Mansooji, H., & Mohseni, A. (2016). The intertextuality in English as foreign language
textbooks: An analytical study of interchange. Journal of Language and Translation, 6, 53-
61.
- Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and texture. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin
(Eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd Ed.). pp 61-81. UK: Willey Blackwell.
- Martinez Alfaro, M, J. (1996). Intertextuality : Origins and development of the concept.
Atlantis, 18(2), 268-285
- Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
- Multasih, S & Rifqui, M. (2012). Enhancing the students’ creative writing ability through
genre and intertextuality based Approach. LITE, 8, 24-3.
- Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Porter, J. E. (1986). Intertextuality and discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5, 34-47
- Richard, J. C., & Shmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied
linguistics (3rd Ed.). London: Longman.
- Robb, L. (2002). Multiple texts: Multiple opportunities for teaching and learning. Voices
from the Middle, 9, 28-32.
-Widdowson, A, G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yule,G. (2010). The study of language(4th Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.