حول فائدة المعايير اللغوية النفسية لدراسة الوصول إلى المعجم العقلي
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
منشور:
Dec 25, 2016
الكلمات المفتاحية:
الوصول إلى المعجم الذهني- الإنتاج اللفظي- المعايير النفسية اللسانية- صور الأشياء- ثبات المعايير –صدق المعايير.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
الملخص
:
من خلال هذا المقال سنبين كيفية الإستفادة من الدراسات الخاصة بالمعايير النفسية اللسانية في فهم آليات الوصول إلى المعجم الذهني، وسنركز اهتمامنا على الوصول إلى المعجم عند الإنتاج اللفظي ، وعلى المعايير النفسية اللسانية، التي تم جمعها من خلال الصور المعروضة عن طريق الرسوم أو الصور الفوتوغرافية للأشياء أو الوجوه أو الأسماء المناسبة لها.
سنقدم بعد جرد سريع للمعايير المتوفرة لهذا النوع من المنبهات، وصفا للمقاييس الأساسية المستقاة سواء من الصور المرسومة أو من الصور الفوتوغرافية للأشياء (مثل : سن الإكتساب ، قابلية التصوير، الألفة المفهومية).
بعد ذلك سنجسد كيف يمكن لهذه المعطيات الملتقطة أن تساعد الباحثين على المستويين التطبيقي والنظري في دراسة المعالجة المعجمية لدىى الراشد (في التسمية والقراءة).
وذلك بالإعتماد على الدراسات المعيارية.سنعوض في الأخير مسألة صدق المعايير وذلك بالإعتماد على المعايير الذاتية لسن الإكتساب.
وسننهي مقالنا هذا باقتراح بعض الآفاق للبحوث المستقبلية حول المعايير النفسية اللسانية.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
كيفية الاقتباس
بونينب. (2016). حول فائدة المعايير اللغوية النفسية لدراسة الوصول إلى المعجم العقلي. AL-Lisaniyyat, 22(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v22i1.359
القسم
Articles
المراجع
Bibliography
- Alario, F. X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for
French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual
complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531-552.
- Bakhtiar, M., Nilipour, R., & Weekes, B. S. (2013). Predictors of timed picture
naming in Persian. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 834-841.
- Balota, D.A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M.J. (2001). Subjective frequency
estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639-647.
- Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass
and Vander wart pictures : Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and
name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human
Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
- Bonin, P. (2013). Psychologie du langage. La fabrique des mots. Approche
cognitive. 2ème édition. Bruxelles : DeBoeck Université.
- Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates are better remembered
than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory &
Cognition, 42,370-382.
- Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2013). Norms and comprehension times
for 305 French idiomatic expression. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 370-
382.
- Bonin, P., Guillemard-Tsaparina, D., & Méot, A. (2013). Determinants of
naming latencies, object comprehension times and new norms for the Russian
standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart
pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 731-745
- Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of
spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology,
93, 89-114.
- Bonin, P., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Roux, S. (2011). L’imageabilité : normes et
relation avec d’autres variables psycholinguistiques. L’Année Psychologique,
111, 329-359.
- Bonin, P., Perret, C., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Mermillod, M. (2008).
Psycholinguistic norms and face naming times for photographs of celebrities
in French. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 137-146.
80 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
- Bonin, P., Roux, S., Barry, C., & Canell, L. (2012). Evidence for a limitedcascading account of written word naming. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1741-1758.
- Bonin, P., Lété, B., Méot, A., Roux, S., & Ferrand, L. (2016). At what age did
you learn “Dog”, “Harp”, and other words that you know? The issue of what
adult age of acquisition (AoA) estimates really measure. In E. Townsend
(Ed.), Learning and Memory: Processes, Influences and Performance (pp.
21-62). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
- Bonin, P., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Fayol, M., & Droit, S. (2004). Psycholinguistic
norms for action photographs in French and their relationships with
spoken and written latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 36, 127-139.
- Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A
new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name
agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity,
image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior
Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158-167.
- Bonin, P., Roux, S., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Fayol, M. (2009). Normes pour
des clips d’actions. L’Année Psychologique, 109, 271-295.
- Brodeur, M., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The
Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos
of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS ONE, 5,
e10773.
- Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A
critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a
new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior
Research Methods, 41, 977-990.
- Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A.M., Bölte, J., & Böhl,
A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and
implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental
Psychology, 58, 412-424.
- Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & New, B. (2011). Assessing the usefulness of
Google Books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word
processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:27.
- Burke, D., McKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of
the tongue: What causes word finding difficulties in young and older adults?
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 81
Patrick Bonin
Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 237-246.
- Cai, Q. & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH : Chinese word and character
frequencies ased on film subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, e10729.
- Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer B., & Fayol M. (2003). Objective
age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French:
Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments, the
English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209-245.
- Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 57A, 1153-1171.
- Cuetos, F., & Alija, M. (2003). Normative data and naming times for action
pictures. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35,168-
177.
- Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbon, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEXESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicologica, 32, 133-
143.
- Desrochers, A., & Thompson, G. L. (2009). Subjective frequency and
imageability ratings for 3,600 French nouns. Behavior Research Methods,
41, 546-557.
- Dimitropoulou, M., DuTabeitia, J. A., Blitsas, P., & Carreiras, M. (2009).
A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name
agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. Behavior Research
Methods, 41, 584–589.
- Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., &
Brysbaert, M. (2008). Age of acquisition and subjective frequency estimates
for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with
other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1049-
1054.
- Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Méot, A.,
Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times
in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from
Chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:306.
- Fiez, J. A., & Tranel, D. (1997). Standardized stimuli and procedures for
investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions.
Memory & Cognition, 25, 543-569.
82 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
- Hansen, D., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). The influence of print
exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6: 113.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research
output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16569-
16572.
- Izura, C., & Playfoot, D. (2012). A normative study of acronyms and acronym
naming Behavior Research Methods, 44, 862-889.
- Johnston, R. A., &Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing.
Visual Cognition, 13, 789-845.
- Johnston, R.A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G.W., & Barry, C. (2010). BritishEnglish norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of
acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 461-469.
- Juhasz, B. J., & Yap (2013) Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 monoand disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 160-168.
- Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Dicke, J.,Taylor, S. C., & Gullick, M. M.(2011).
Tangible words are recognized faster: The grounding of meaning in sensory
and perceptual systems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64,
1683-1691.
- Kang, S. H. K., Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Kurby, C. A. (2011). Semantic size
does not matter: “Bigger” words are not recognized faster. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1041-1047.
- Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new
frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior
Research Methods, 42, 643-650.
- Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-ofacquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research
Methods, 44, 978-990.
- Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). Manulex: A grade-level
lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156-166.
- Masterson, J., Druks, J. (1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs
matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition. J.
Neurolinguist., 11, 331-354.
- Nairne, J. S., V-anArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., &
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 83
Patrick Bonin
LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy.
Psychological Science, 24, 2099-2105.
- New, B., Brysbaert, M., Véronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film
subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661-
677.
- New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2 : A new
French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 36, 516-524.
- New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for
animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598-16603.
- Nishimoto, T., Miyawaki, K., Ueda, T., Une, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2005).
Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 37,
398-416.
- Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting
the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130,
466 - 478.
- Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd
revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396.
- Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
- Pathman, T., Doydum, A., & Bauer, P. J. (2013). Bringing order to life events:
Memory for the temporal order of autobiographical events over an extended
period in school-aged children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 115,309-325.
- Pind, J., Jonsdottir, H., Tryggvadottir, H. B., & Jonsson, F. (2000). Icelandic
norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image
agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology, 41, 41-48.
- Raman, I., Raman, E., & Mertan, B. (2014). A standardized set of 260 pictures
for Turkish: Norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual
complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 46,
588-595.
- Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s
84 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.
Perception, 33, 217-236.
- Roux, S., Bonin, P.,& Kandel, S. (2014). The “BIG BIRD” of the “YELLOW
YOUNG” man: Do nontarget properties cascade? The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 67, 763-784.
- Salmon J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types
of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of
acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 42,
82-95.
- Sanfeliu, M. C., & Fernandez, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart
pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image
agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, & Computers, 28, 537-555.
- Schwitter, V., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M. (2004). French
normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 564-576.
- Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Predicting naming latencies for
action pictures: Dutch norms. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 274-83.
- Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R.
(2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during
visual word recognition: the body- object interaction effect. Cognition, 106,
433-443.
- Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Dalrymple, H-A. R., Stearns, J., & Owen, W.
J. (2011). Some insults are more difficult to ignore: The embodied insult
Stroop effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1266–1294.
- Sirois, M., Kremin, H., & Cohen, H. (2006). Picture-naming norms for
Canadian French: Name agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, and age
of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 300-306.
- Snodgrass, J. C., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures:
Norms for names agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual
complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and
Memory, 6, 174-215.
- Székely, A., & Bates, E. (2000). Objective visual complexity as a variable in
studies of picture naming. CRL Newsletter, 12, 3-33.
- Székely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Feder- meier, K., Herron, D., Iyer,
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 85
Patrick Bonin
G., Jacobsen, T., Arevalo, A. L., Vargha, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Timed
action and object naming. Cortex, 41, 3-5.
- Tabossi, P., Arduino, L., & Fanari, R. (2011). Descriptive norms for 245 Italian
idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 110-123.
- Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Body-object
interaction ratings for 1,618 mono- syllabic nouns. Behavior Research
Methods, 40, 1075–1078.
- Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic
expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality.
Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 247–270.
- Tsaparina, D., Bonin, P., & Méot, A. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement,
image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart
pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability
scores for the modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43,1085-
1099.
- VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R. (2013).
Adaptive memory: Animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages.
Experimental Psychology, 60, 172-178.
- Yoon, C., Feinberg, F., Luo, T., Hedden, T., Gutchess, A. H., Chen, H., Mikels,
J., Jiao, S., & Park, D. C. (2004). A cross-culturally standardized set of
pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name
agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, and Computers, 36, 639-649.
86 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
Note d’auteur
Le contenu du présent article a fait l’objet d’une conférence inaugurale à Alger
en décembre 2013 au dans le cadre d’une Conférence Internationale sur Le
Lexique Mental. L’auteur tient à remercier vivement M. Rachid Benmalek
ainsi que M. Kaci, et tous les chercheur(e)s de l’équipe Pathologie du langage.
- Alario, F. X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for
French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual
complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531-552.
- Bakhtiar, M., Nilipour, R., & Weekes, B. S. (2013). Predictors of timed picture
naming in Persian. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 834-841.
- Balota, D.A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M.J. (2001). Subjective frequency
estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639-647.
- Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass
and Vander wart pictures : Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and
name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human
Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
- Bonin, P. (2013). Psychologie du langage. La fabrique des mots. Approche
cognitive. 2ème édition. Bruxelles : DeBoeck Université.
- Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates are better remembered
than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory &
Cognition, 42,370-382.
- Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2013). Norms and comprehension times
for 305 French idiomatic expression. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 370-
382.
- Bonin, P., Guillemard-Tsaparina, D., & Méot, A. (2013). Determinants of
naming latencies, object comprehension times and new norms for the Russian
standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart
pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 731-745
- Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of
spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology,
93, 89-114.
- Bonin, P., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Roux, S. (2011). L’imageabilité : normes et
relation avec d’autres variables psycholinguistiques. L’Année Psychologique,
111, 329-359.
- Bonin, P., Perret, C., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Mermillod, M. (2008).
Psycholinguistic norms and face naming times for photographs of celebrities
in French. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 137-146.
80 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
- Bonin, P., Roux, S., Barry, C., & Canell, L. (2012). Evidence for a limitedcascading account of written word naming. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1741-1758.
- Bonin, P., Lété, B., Méot, A., Roux, S., & Ferrand, L. (2016). At what age did
you learn “Dog”, “Harp”, and other words that you know? The issue of what
adult age of acquisition (AoA) estimates really measure. In E. Townsend
(Ed.), Learning and Memory: Processes, Influences and Performance (pp.
21-62). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
- Bonin, P., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Fayol, M., & Droit, S. (2004). Psycholinguistic
norms for action photographs in French and their relationships with
spoken and written latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 36, 127-139.
- Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A
new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name
agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity,
image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior
Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158-167.
- Bonin, P., Roux, S., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Fayol, M. (2009). Normes pour
des clips d’actions. L’Année Psychologique, 109, 271-295.
- Brodeur, M., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The
Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos
of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS ONE, 5,
e10773.
- Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A
critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a
new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior
Research Methods, 41, 977-990.
- Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A.M., Bölte, J., & Böhl,
A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and
implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental
Psychology, 58, 412-424.
- Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & New, B. (2011). Assessing the usefulness of
Google Books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word
processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:27.
- Burke, D., McKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of
the tongue: What causes word finding difficulties in young and older adults?
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 81
Patrick Bonin
Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 237-246.
- Cai, Q. & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH : Chinese word and character
frequencies ased on film subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, e10729.
- Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer B., & Fayol M. (2003). Objective
age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French:
Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments, the
English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209-245.
- Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 57A, 1153-1171.
- Cuetos, F., & Alija, M. (2003). Normative data and naming times for action
pictures. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35,168-
177.
- Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbon, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEXESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicologica, 32, 133-
143.
- Desrochers, A., & Thompson, G. L. (2009). Subjective frequency and
imageability ratings for 3,600 French nouns. Behavior Research Methods,
41, 546-557.
- Dimitropoulou, M., DuTabeitia, J. A., Blitsas, P., & Carreiras, M. (2009).
A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name
agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. Behavior Research
Methods, 41, 584–589.
- Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., &
Brysbaert, M. (2008). Age of acquisition and subjective frequency estimates
for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with
other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1049-
1054.
- Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Méot, A.,
Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times
in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from
Chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:306.
- Fiez, J. A., & Tranel, D. (1997). Standardized stimuli and procedures for
investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions.
Memory & Cognition, 25, 543-569.
82 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
- Hansen, D., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). The influence of print
exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6: 113.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research
output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16569-
16572.
- Izura, C., & Playfoot, D. (2012). A normative study of acronyms and acronym
naming Behavior Research Methods, 44, 862-889.
- Johnston, R. A., &Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing.
Visual Cognition, 13, 789-845.
- Johnston, R.A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G.W., & Barry, C. (2010). BritishEnglish norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of
acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 461-469.
- Juhasz, B. J., & Yap (2013) Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 monoand disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 160-168.
- Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Dicke, J.,Taylor, S. C., & Gullick, M. M.(2011).
Tangible words are recognized faster: The grounding of meaning in sensory
and perceptual systems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64,
1683-1691.
- Kang, S. H. K., Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Kurby, C. A. (2011). Semantic size
does not matter: “Bigger” words are not recognized faster. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1041-1047.
- Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new
frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior
Research Methods, 42, 643-650.
- Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-ofacquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research
Methods, 44, 978-990.
- Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). Manulex: A grade-level
lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156-166.
- Masterson, J., Druks, J. (1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs
matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition. J.
Neurolinguist., 11, 331-354.
- Nairne, J. S., V-anArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., &
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 83
Patrick Bonin
LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy.
Psychological Science, 24, 2099-2105.
- New, B., Brysbaert, M., Véronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film
subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661-
677.
- New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2 : A new
French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 36, 516-524.
- New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for
animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598-16603.
- Nishimoto, T., Miyawaki, K., Ueda, T., Une, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2005).
Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 37,
398-416.
- Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting
the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130,
466 - 478.
- Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd
revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396.
- Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
- Pathman, T., Doydum, A., & Bauer, P. J. (2013). Bringing order to life events:
Memory for the temporal order of autobiographical events over an extended
period in school-aged children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 115,309-325.
- Pind, J., Jonsdottir, H., Tryggvadottir, H. B., & Jonsson, F. (2000). Icelandic
norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image
agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology, 41, 41-48.
- Raman, I., Raman, E., & Mertan, B. (2014). A standardized set of 260 pictures
for Turkish: Norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual
complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 46,
588-595.
- Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s
84 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
De l’utilite des normes psycholinguistiques pour l’etude de l’acces au lexique mental
object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.
Perception, 33, 217-236.
- Roux, S., Bonin, P.,& Kandel, S. (2014). The “BIG BIRD” of the “YELLOW
YOUNG” man: Do nontarget properties cascade? The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 67, 763-784.
- Salmon J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types
of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of
acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 42,
82-95.
- Sanfeliu, M. C., & Fernandez, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart
pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image
agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, & Computers, 28, 537-555.
- Schwitter, V., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M. (2004). French
normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 564-576.
- Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Predicting naming latencies for
action pictures: Dutch norms. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 274-83.
- Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R.
(2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during
visual word recognition: the body- object interaction effect. Cognition, 106,
433-443.
- Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Dalrymple, H-A. R., Stearns, J., & Owen, W.
J. (2011). Some insults are more difficult to ignore: The embodied insult
Stroop effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1266–1294.
- Sirois, M., Kremin, H., & Cohen, H. (2006). Picture-naming norms for
Canadian French: Name agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, and age
of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 300-306.
- Snodgrass, J. C., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures:
Norms for names agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual
complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and
Memory, 6, 174-215.
- Székely, A., & Bates, E. (2000). Objective visual complexity as a variable in
studies of picture naming. CRL Newsletter, 12, 3-33.
- Székely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Feder- meier, K., Herron, D., Iyer,
AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22 85
Patrick Bonin
G., Jacobsen, T., Arevalo, A. L., Vargha, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Timed
action and object naming. Cortex, 41, 3-5.
- Tabossi, P., Arduino, L., & Fanari, R. (2011). Descriptive norms for 245 Italian
idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 110-123.
- Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Body-object
interaction ratings for 1,618 mono- syllabic nouns. Behavior Research
Methods, 40, 1075–1078.
- Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic
expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality.
Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 247–270.
- Tsaparina, D., Bonin, P., & Méot, A. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement,
image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart
pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability
scores for the modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43,1085-
1099.
- VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R. (2013).
Adaptive memory: Animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages.
Experimental Psychology, 60, 172-178.
- Yoon, C., Feinberg, F., Luo, T., Hedden, T., Gutchess, A. H., Chen, H., Mikels,
J., Jiao, S., & Park, D. C. (2004). A cross-culturally standardized set of
pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name
agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, and Computers, 36, 639-649.
86 AL-LIS½NIYY½T - Numéro 22
Note d’auteur
Le contenu du présent article a fait l’objet d’une conférence inaugurale à Alger
en décembre 2013 au dans le cadre d’une Conférence Internationale sur Le
Lexique Mental. L’auteur tient à remercier vivement M. Rachid Benmalek
ainsi que M. Kaci, et tous les chercheur(e)s de l’équipe Pathologie du langage.