Linguistic and Stylistic Analysis of Texts

Main Article Content

Meftah Ben arous

Abstract

The recent progress of studies in cognitive field in linguistic text analysis can allow text grammar and stylistics to find common problematics. Some of the fields in which cognitive processing and discursive specificity may be taken in account conjointly are presented: drawing up connections between linguis- tic markers and textual structures, determining relevant textual units, defining a dynamic context, taking into account the discursive memory and the processing of informational structure. The emphasis is on interaction that occurs between various subsystems in coherence processing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ben arous, M. (2017). Linguistic and Stylistic Analysis of Texts. AL-Lisaniyyat, 23(2), 79-112. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v23i2.284
Section
Articles

References

ARIEL, M, 1990, Accessing Noun PhraseAntecedents, Londres, Roufledge. BEAUGRANDE, R. de, 1984, "Critère devalution des modèles du processus de lecture", in G, Dernière, éd, Il était une fois.... Presses Universitaires de
Lille BEGUELIN, M-J, 1988,"Anaphore, cataphore et mémoire discursive", Pra
tiques, 57, 15-43.
BEGUELIN, M-J. 1995, "Les problèmes d'emploi du gérondif et des parti- cipiales en français.
contemporain"in K. Zaleska et A. Cataldi, edsla Français Langue Étrangère à l'Université théorie et pratique, Univ. Varsovie, 243-260, BENVENISTE, E, 1970, "L'appareil formel de l'énonciation" Langages, 17, 12-18.
BERRENDONNER, A, 1990, "Pour une macro-syntaxe", Travauxde Lin- guistique, 21, 25-36.
BERRENDONNER,A,et M-J BEGUELIN, 1989, "Décalages: les niveaux de T'analyse linguistique", Langue Française, 81, 99-124.
CHARE, W, 1994, Discourse, consciousness, and time, Univ, of Chicago Press.
CHAROLLES, M, 1993, "Les plans d'organisation du discours et leur inte- raction", in S, Moirand et al, eds, Parcours linguistiques de discours spécia lisés, Berne, Peter Lang, 301-314
CHAROLLES, M, et COMBETTES, B, 1999, "Contribution pour une ana-
lyse récente de l'analyse du discours Langue Française, 121, 76-116. CHAROLLES, M, et COMBETTES, B, 2001, "De la phrase au discours: rupture et continuité", in C, Gancia-Debancet al, eds, Quelles grammaires
Delagrave et CRDP Midi-Pyrénées.
COMBETTES, B, 1998, Les constructions détachés et français, Paris, Ophrys.
COMBETTES, B, 2000, "Lapposition comme unité textuelle et constituant phrastique: approche diachronique", Langue française, 125, 90-105.
DELANCY, S, 1981, "An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns" Language, 57, 626-657.
DE MULDER, W, 1990, "Anaphore définie versus anaphore démonstrative: un problème sémantique?" in G.Kleiber et J-E-Thyvaert, eds, Lanaphore et ses domaines, klincksieck, Paris, 143-158.
DRESSLER, W, 1996, "Parallelisms between Natural Textlinguistics and other components of Natural Linguistics", Spractypologie und Universa- li-enfarschung, 49, 295-311.
DUBOIS J, W, 1987, "The discourse basis of negativity" Language, 63, 805- 855.
DURIE, M, 1994, "A case study of pragmatic linking", Text, 14, 495-529.
Fleischman, S, 1991, "Discourse Pragmatics and the Grammar of Old French ABuvetinatiinterpretation et si and the Personal Pronouris", Roma- ticePhitalogy, 44, 251-283.
CIVON, T, 1983, éd, Topic Continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross
language Study Amsterdam, Benjamins. HOPPER, P, 1985,"Discourse Function and Word Order Shift A Typologi-
cal Study of the VS/SV alternation", in W. P.Lehman (éd) Language Typolo- gy 1985, J. Benjamins, 123-140.
HOPPER, P, &THOMPSON, S. A, 1980. "Transitivity in grammar and dis- course", Language, 56, 251-299.
HOPPER,R, 1998, "Universals of narrative pragmatics a Polynesian case stu- dy", Linguistics 36, 119-160.
KARABÉTIAN, E, 2000, Histoire des stylistiques, Paris, Armand Colin.
KLEIBERG, 1994, "Contexte interprétation et mémoire: approche stan- dard vs approche cognitive", Langue Française, 103, 9-22.
LAMBRECHT, K, 1987, "On the status of SVO sentences of spoken French", in R. Tomlin (ed), Coherence and grounding in discourse, J. Benjamins 217-262.
LANBRECHT, K, 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents, Cambridge University Press.
MILNER, J-C, et F. REGNAULT, 1987, Dire le vers, Ed.du seuil, Paris. MOLINIE,G, 1986, Éléments de stylistique française, Paris, PU F.
MYHILL, J. 1992, Typological Discourse Analysis.quantitativeapproches to the study of linguistic function Oxford, Blackwell.
NEVEU, F, 1998, Études sur l'apposition, Paris, H. Champion.
ODOWD, E, 1990, Discourse pressure.gerneand grammatical alignment -
after Dubois Studies in Language, 14, 365-403.
PAYNE, D, 1987, "Information structuring in Papago narrative discourse", Linguistics, 63, 782-804.
PAYNE, D, 1994, "OVSuVersuO in Panare(Cariban): Do syntax and dis- course match? Text, 14, 581-610.
PEREZ LONRIDO, R, 1996, "On the Grammatical Domain of Gapping in Old English Syntax and Pragmatics", Diachronica, 13, 319-346,
PRINCE, E, F, 1988, "Discourse Analysis a part of linguistic competence", in Linguistics The Cambridge Survey, vol, II., 164-182.
REINHART, T, 1984,"Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal orga- nization of narrative texts", Linguistics, 22, 779-809.
RYCHNER, J. 1970, I' articulation des phrases narratives dans la Mort Artu Genève, Droz